|
week seven
july 25 -
july 29
Monday, July 25:
I drove in from my brother's house in New York this morning, so I
didn't get very much work done. But I did get to update my
website and work on the Chemo glossary a little bit, since we had the
Baystate visit last Friday. I also got a chance to print out some
papers on Perspective research in requirement solicitation and
processes, so those should be interesting to read.
Tuesday, July 26:
I read two papers today: one on Scenario-Based Requirements Analysis
and the other on multiple views in requirements specifications.
Both were interesting...but hard to understand since I don't know the
most basic concepts in the papers. I need to read more to figure
out what's going on. I also started to rework the Chemotherapy
process in LittleJIL...and realized that these meetings with Baystate
are not as productive as they should be. There are a couple
definite issues associated with dealing with medical professionals:
namely, they aren't computer scientists, which isn't a problem, but the
fact that we have no means of clearly communicating data to them is a
major problem. For instance, in these Baystate meetings, I have
been printing out the LittleJIL diagrams which look like complicated
flowcharts in the form of a hierarchical tree. Trees are basic in
computer science. The topmost node in a tree is known as the
parent, conveying the most general information (if any), then as the
children branch off below the parent, more specific data is conveyed,
with the most important, hard data residing in the children leaf
nodes. Top to bottom, left to right is immediately obvious for
computer scientists. For the medical professionals, they show
immediate frustration at having to flip through three printed pages of
diagrams to reach the depth of the first leaf node. This is an
annoyance computer scientists are willing to swallow, but as a medical
professional, they see no reason in it. It is true I am new to
the act of capturing processes, but I do not think it is logical to
speak to the doctors, pharmacists, and nurses in our language
(mathematical diagrams) and have them reply in their language (medical
terminology). We need to take a different approach to bridge the
gap, and I'm still not really sure what that approach is. I have
a meeting with George tomorrow so I hope we get to discuss that.
Plus I need to talk to him about the final DMP paper!
Wednesday, July 27:
Today I met with George to talk about what I've been doing in the
past week. We talked about the Chemotherapy process, and how the
meetings were going at Baystate, and I expressed concern over our ways
of communicating the information conveyed in our process. He was
very helpful in suggesting alternatives to presenting the data, and
encouraged me to take a different approach with the Medical
Professionals because it can only help process elucidation for future
cases. George also went into detail to explain how Computer
Science papers get submitted, reviewed, and presented at research
conferences. I never knew so much went into reviewing a major
piece of work, and I didn't even know the difference between a paper
published in a journal and one published from a conference. We
talked about graduate schools, too...well what else is new?
Haha...yep that's always on my mind these days. What to study,
where to go, who to work with...I don't know how to answer any of these
questions yet. I really like software engineering, but do I like
it enough to pursue it in depth for years and years?
Probably. I don't know anything about hardware, and I feel like I
really struggle in math...and I haven't seen any combinations of
Computer Science and Statistics before, since I think Stat is a basic
part of any good research, so that really doesn't help too much.
Well I do know one thing for sure: I love majoring in Computer
Science as an undergraduate. I definitely think I picked the best
major...problem solving, logical thinking, a little bit of engineering,
stepping back to see how the big picture all fits together...I think
some people give Computer Science a bad rap. The title 'Computer
Science' really doesn't do justice to what's actually studied in the
field. It's so much more than computers, and maybe not a whole
lot of science...either way, it is very deceiving to those thinking
about majoring in it. And I don't think I could have done
anything else. I don't like animals too much...I've seen
surgeries and they gross me out...chemistry doesn't make any sense...I
don't have the patience to pursue a degree in Psychology...I struggle
with Math...I can't remember names, dates, or historical
events...modern business practices don't interest me...well it looks
like I'm stuck with computers!
Thursday, July 28:
Today I printed out all the previously typed notes I had from past
Baystate visits so I could attempt to organize them in some type of
searchable way. That didn't work. Too much of the notes I
took overlaps between agents, artifacts, actions....organizing them in
categories is near impossible. I hope I can think of a way
to pass the work associated with this process on to the next person on
the project.
Friday, July 29:
Fridays
mean Medical Safety Meetings. We discussed (at length) a new
approach to presenting the process to the Medical Professionals, and
established that there has never been a set way of doing this. No
one is in agreement about how to start, either. Well I'm working
really hard on this, and while it might not be exactly what the LASER
lab expected to get, I'm trying to make it as accurate as
possible. I still believe that it is more important that I
capture the process as accurately as I can, instead of attempting to
teach the language that the process is represented in to the folks at
Baystate. We have a visit on Monday, so we'll see how this new
approach goes. A LASER meeting immediately followed that meeting,
since a lot of people were on vacation and such, so we got it out of
the way.
Now, I'm off to the horse races of Saratoga Springs, NY! I'll
post pictures one of these days.
|